I think somewhere to START with this rule, if you wanted to go ahead with it Skanzler, would be that no horses could be tied one hour after the last class of the day had ended, and tying could resume two hours before the first class of the day is scheduled to begin.
I think that's an excellent suggestion, especially if you add the caveat that they can't be tied
unattended in their stalls after those hours. The intention after all is to prevent people from leaving their horses tied overnight, not to keep people from grooming after hours.
Making a rule which states no horse may be tied for more than one hour would be very hard to enforce, because who is going to go around noting times? If you see a horse tied, then return two hours later and he is still tied, how do you know he's been tied there the entire time? He could have been taken away, shown, watered & then put back--you may be sure he has stood there the entire two hours, but it's difficult to prove.
That is what I'd been thinking. Of course there are times when everyone knows the person did NOT move the horse, but how do you prove it? And you'd have to be able to or innocent people would get nailed instead. Much better to have a clear rule than something that allows the violator to say "prove it" and then laugh in your face when you can't do anything in spite of the new rule. Where does it end, video cameras in all the barns and Show Police?
Those of you that feel that this rule is an injustice to owners and trainers, thank you for your input too. All I can say to those individuals is, I would hate to be your horse. If you would "just walk away" from a horse in distress, you don't deserve to own one of these exquisite animals.
SKanzler, I can see that you feel very strongly on this topic and I appreciate what you are trying to do for the horses. I'm getting a little tired however of being told that if we're not 100% behind a rule that we are cruel owners or too lazy to dress our horses or otherwise evil. When I'm at a CDE Kody spends most of the day tied to the trailer under supervision on a long enough lead to graze. Would I rather he were out in a paddock somewhere? Sure! But in that case tying him outside in the fresh air is preferable to putting him in a dusty, dark, boring stall where he can't see out. Am I being cruel? I don't think so. Kody prances all the way to the trailer and drags his feet all the way back to the barn. When I haul I don't stop every hour as you do. I don't do that because it is my belief that it is easier on the horse to go for a couple of hours at a stretch than to be interrupted constantly and get their hopes up that it is time to leave the trailer. I base this on studies I have read and my own personal experience with a horse whose welfare and happiness means everything to me. Anyone who knows me knows I would never ask Kody to do anything I wouldn't myself. So am I evil because I make him stand there for two or three hours? I hope not!
I guess my point is that while you are right that some things simply are not relative, they are WRONG, the attempt to write a specific rule for each and every one of them can cause more problems than it solves. I agree with whomever said to EDUCATE, not legislate. Are a lot of these people going to listen? No, of course not. As someone else said if they thought they were doing something wrong they'd hide it or stop doing it. But perhaps the weight of combined disapproval from all those educated individuals around them will convince them to change. It will at least prevent someone else from thinking it's a good idea and following suit! I believe the existing show rules against cruelty should apply to a situation like this or be reworded so the show officials have the power to insist on a change in the animal's condition or risk expulsion from the show. Muzzle them and turn them loose, or gosh forbid this fellow should realize that it is not normal for adult horses to put everything they see in their mouths and look at what management practices he uses at home to cause this psychosis. I believe in children it's called "picca" and it is not healthy! Perhaps the show veterinary could be called in to assess whether the horses are in more danger from being tied to the point of exhaustion for five days or from wearing a muzzle- I don't doubt which way he'd rule and those horses would be turned loose or taken home.
I think we have the power to make a change and I agree with you that by tolerating this sort of thing we are sanctioning it. Make a rule but please be careful how you phrase it! Give more power to enforce the rules we have, not just blocking one single way to be cruel. You know they'll just find some way around it- people always do. The good guys are always trying to catch up, chasing after the "bad guys" with law after law until everyone
else is too hedged in by rules to move! My local Fair is proof of what happens when you go down that slippery slope and it isn't pretty.
I just don't want to see the same thing happen to AMHR/A while the horses still suffer in more and more creative and hard-to-prove ways.
These are just my thoughts and are not meant to endorse the specified behavior or say I don't agree with you that it's reprehensible. I do. I just want to make sure any rule you put forth is actually enforceable, which means concrete and provable. It doesn't do any good if it doesn't change anything.
By the way, from the sound of things I would have no trouble shipping or having one of my horses show under you. And that's saying something as I am generally NOT fond of halter trainers of any breed!
Keep up the good work.
I applaude you for wanting to make a change.
Leia