Cranky, I did call you cranky (and you were) and since then, you've embraced and adopted the handle as your own.
Oiy already rather than again engage in the 5 yr old circular logic argument, we'll just set your untruth aside.
Some reasons I like Romney:
GOOD finally some meat even if no specifics,
I think Romney did very well in the debates and I agreed with much of what he said
I kept wondering specifically what he was saying as being a polished Politician, he had a good volume of rather empty words that could mean a wide range of things. Lots of wiggle room for breaking promises later in other words. Remember, he is is on record stating that he will move to the left and therefore break promises. I guess this shallow rhetoric appeals to some, but not me. Kinda like agreeing with air.
, I think he can defeat Obama,
In fact he may, it depends on whom the masters choose. As I've stated his ties to the banking houses, their agenda and his strong and long ties to their organs like the Mossad make it difficult to know at this point.
and I really like that he's a successful business man.
Ah yes, the now typical neocon theme of government run like a business and the President as the CEO. In reading the Constitution this is an abhorrent thought process and the document is void of ANY sense of this mind set altogether. Our founders, FULLY understanding the nature of corporations made manifestly clear that unlike England, America would operate devoid those trappings. The two thought process' are antithetical to each other. The one is based on Admiralty Process also known as the law of the sea, mercantile law or today, UCC. The other and noble system of Law is Common Law. Our Constitution was written in Common law. Again the two systems are antithetical!
Whether or not that partial list is good enough for you isn't any more up to me than it is of concern to me. I think Romney will be the GOP nominee. I will vote the GOP ticket. This is because the Republican Party matches my feelings about important matters (the economy,
Um the rep "party" also drove the economy into the ground for decades.
National security,
Really? I would suggest that you upgrade your intel sources pretty dramatically. They have led to wars what didn't need fought and did so with provable lies masquerading as "intelligence". The phsy-op campaign for weeks on T.V. prior to the "first" gulf war was quite successful. In the end the reasons "claimed" were proven false. So much so that the official reason has had to change several times since then and even today. How do we know this? Because the mythical wmd's can be detected from orbiting satellites, just like those airliners that went "missing" all at the same instant, I might add. Ritter, Kay and the Austrian (can't recall his name at the moment) all emphatically stated No wmd's Can't recall if it was Kay who asked "If you know where they are tell us and we will go get them" I believe Rummy's response was a very precise, north, east, west and south of Baghdad ...... Ritter was destroyed by the neo's for having the temerity to tell the truth as he witnessed it. This horrible and singular event was used by your party for all froward motion since and is a significant "way-point" as to why we are where we are in the world today and why we are so much more unsafe.
personal responsibility)
We must define personal responsibility for "they" refuse to take responsibility for their actions. We the People bear the full brunt and responsibility for their actions. They and they alone have created ALL of these messes and problems in BOTH parties yes, but right now were talking about yours and mine. Economically we are being destroyed, Bot parties are responsible but it was the rep party that started the unConstitutional tarps
much more closely than the Democratic Party does. Plain and simple. You may have made some brilliant points in your epic long LB posts, but you're not on my list of the political talking heads.
Wait a minute how can I be "epic" and not on the list? Ah perhaps because I don't speak "politics" preferring to speak Liberty instead.
I just don't have the desire to fully explore your own long justifications of your own point of view (your "logic"?)
Yes this has also been the point all along. But then all of this hasn't been for you........... While I try to never give up hope, I've been reading tea-leaves for a long time now. My read on you thus far has been correct. Hopefully others have taken note of my epic (HA) long posts and have had their eyes opened to things as they are.
.
Many others enjoy doing so, and it's never bad news when people think about politics.
