Neil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2002
- Messages
- 537
- Reaction score
- 0
There has been a lot of discussion about what happen at the recent AMHA Membership Meeting and in the past there have been discussions about wanting to participate at the meeting online and also be able to vote on rules changes, officer elections and any motions made. For the first time we have been able to watch and listen to the membership meeting as it progressed for a day and a half.
My pole above is to see how many people watched the meeting. But, I would like that when you vote yes that you did more than just check it out for a short while and leave. To vote yes I would lke to know that you watched long enough that you listened to proposed rule changes, listen to the conversations pro and con and make a rational decision on how you would have voted while the voting at the meeting was going on. This also extends on to the nominations of officers, a description of thier qualifications and the final voting.
If you can say that you watched enough to understand what was going on and could make a rational vote please vote YES.
If you did not watch or watched but didn't stay long or pay attention to the descussions please vote NO.
My pole above is to see how many people watched the meeting. But, I would like that when you vote yes that you did more than just check it out for a short while and leave. To vote yes I would lke to know that you watched long enough that you listened to proposed rule changes, listen to the conversations pro and con and make a rational decision on how you would have voted while the voting at the meeting was going on. This also extends on to the nominations of officers, a description of thier qualifications and the final voting.
If you can say that you watched enough to understand what was going on and could make a rational vote please vote YES.
If you did not watch or watched but didn't stay long or pay attention to the descussions please vote NO.