Well - it is interesting reading everyone's opinions. I have been ripped off many times with the purchase of miniature horses. I do know that it will never happen to me again - because I plan to sell all of my horses and walk away from this part of my life. I can't trust anyone - whereas I tend to be way too honest (if that is possible).
I plan to have the filly checked by my vet to make sure that there isn't anything else going on in her mouth. She is undershot - not overshot - that is why I am so concerned.
I used to breed show dogs and stood behind my breeding program 100% - and I am the same with the minis - but I guess that isn't the way that all breeders feel!!!!!
Thanks for the words of encouragement. I am not new into the breed - I did lots of research and homework when I first started into minis. I have spent a lot of money buying the best that I could afford - and I do have some really nice horses. But I have had way too many bad experiences and although I totally love and adore the breed - I am at a point where I need to move on. I believe that the breeder of this filly would try to rectify the problem - but to ship this filly back will likely cost me $1000 to $1500 and if she replaced this filly with another one - the cost to ship that horse here would be the same. So my original investment which was high (especially in the market today) would have another $3000 tacked on to it - and for what? It is difficult to sell anything in this market - unless you are one of the "big" breeders.
I have purchased a horse that was starving (she was represented as being "thin" when she was actually emaciated) - and when I posted about that mare (and the seller still posts lots on this forum) - my posting was deleted. I never once mentioned the mare's name or the seller's name - as I didn't want to cause a scandal - but when the seller found the posting she told the whole world who she was etc and the posting was deleted.
I purchased a lovely bred mare from a breeder (far away from me) and when the mare foaled a 24" colt I questioned the breeder on the stallion and it was only then that she mentioned that the mare had "gotten in" with her shetland stallion - why wouldn't she have told me that before?
The list goes on and on. Obviously I am way too trusting and that is a fault of mine.
I had someone inquire recently about a mare that I have for sale - I told her all of the good qualities about the mare and also told her what the faults of the mare were. She commended me on my honesty and couldn't quite believe how honest I was. She didn't buy the mare - and that was OK with me as I don't want to sell a horse to someone that isn't exactly what they really want.
I know that there are honest people out there - and I have bought some very nice horses from honest people - but there are too many out there that are happy about making a sale and what happens after that they really don't care about.
Holy Moly...that IS bad!Hi everyone - I am working on finding transport to send this filly back to the breeder (of course at my expense). I thought you would like to see a picture of the bite on this show quality filly. It is a shame as the filly is so pretty - but this isn't show or breeding quality in my mind.
SHAME, SHAME, SHAME on that breeder
These type of breeders should be SHOT
We need to have a way of being able to weed these kind of sellers out. Can you imagine what it must be like for foreign buyers who have to spend thousands of dollars to buy and ship horses to them. Austrailia and New Zealand cost $12,000 to get a horse shipped to them and can you imagine how they would feel if they recieved a horse like that?
Since when is the seller obligated to do anything? It is the BUYERS responcibility, not the sellers. The seller can not LIE about the horse, other than that, its the buyer. The buyer is not required to be made aware of anything... its their duty to discover everything they can to make an informed decision. If the buyer didn't do even a basic exam, either by a trusted associate, vet, or themselves, they can blame nobody but themselves for the bad purchase.
I have heard and seen a few good breeders in Ontario that do not care about broodmares teeth being offEveryone looking for the perfect stallion, but what about our mares and fillies
Well, lets just say well known sellers in the miniature horse world.Are they REALLY "good breeders" though, if they breed mares with bad bites? OH! A "good breeder" IMO is one who is trying to improve the breed overall, for one thing. That means not breeding any animal with a major fault. All horses have faults of some sort and to some degree, but there are some that just should never be reproduced, and bad bite is, IMO, one of those, and a biggie.I have heard and seen a few good breeders in Ontario that do not care about broodmares teeth being offEveryone looking for the perfect stallion, but what about our mares and fillies
If one wouldn't be happy with a foal that is an exact replica of the mare, then I really don't think that such a mare should reproduce. JMO.
Well, lets just say well known sellers in the miniature horse world. The same thing with knowing their stallion has had stiffle problems, and still breed.
I am not implying that AMHR has inferrior horses. You are missinterpreting what I am trying to say. All of mine are double registered too, by the way. I am just stating that all registries should check for bites and testicles at all shows, in every class. That way, people will not be so indifferent to their horses having bad bites. Unfortunatly, AMHR still does not always check for bites, as I know someone who shows a horse with a bad bite in halter and she mostly gets away with it.I have to go off topic just for a minute and say to Riverdance, maybe you need to go to a few AMHR shows, used to or once did does not qualify you to state that they do not check bites at AMHR, because they do. Maybe not multiple times a day like AMHA, but please do not keep making the statement that AMHR doesn't care about perpetuating quality because they don't constantly check bites and balls! My horses are double registered, does that make them slightly inferior to the AMHA only and slightly superior to the AMHR only???? I don't want to argue but I just don't like the constant implication that AMHR as a whole has inferior horses and standards!
Enter your email address to join: