I was having this discussion with a friend thought I would open it up here.
What makes someone a top breeder? Is it the size of the actual farm? The number of foals they have a year? The length of time they have been breeding? The ability to produce color consistently? How well those horses do in the show ring?
I had someone discussing this with me they are large horse people and not breeders and are looking for a couple of pet minis. They have been dealing with plenty of breeders and all claim to be "good" which is very subjective lol. So she asked me well what makes one a good breeder compared to someone down the road.
For me it is not the amount of foals put out although I do realize sometimes it takes 20 foals born to get those 2-4 outstanding ones. It has nothing to do with length of time breeding I have seen those doing it for years that refuse to make any changes- For me I would have to say it is the consistency of the foals and how well those foals do in the show ring consistently. I realize not ever breeder shows but there is no disputing there are certain names associated with winning in the show ring year after year.
If a breeder has had only 10 foals ever but 1- 2 have been in the show ring doing something over the years that means more to me then the breeder who puts out 100+ foals and has one or 2 out there showing. Might not be fair but it is just my first and honest opinion.
Anyone else?
What makes someone a top breeder? Is it the size of the actual farm? The number of foals they have a year? The length of time they have been breeding? The ability to produce color consistently? How well those horses do in the show ring?
I had someone discussing this with me they are large horse people and not breeders and are looking for a couple of pet minis. They have been dealing with plenty of breeders and all claim to be "good" which is very subjective lol. So she asked me well what makes one a good breeder compared to someone down the road.
For me it is not the amount of foals put out although I do realize sometimes it takes 20 foals born to get those 2-4 outstanding ones. It has nothing to do with length of time breeding I have seen those doing it for years that refuse to make any changes- For me I would have to say it is the consistency of the foals and how well those foals do in the show ring consistently. I realize not ever breeder shows but there is no disputing there are certain names associated with winning in the show ring year after year.
If a breeder has had only 10 foals ever but 1- 2 have been in the show ring doing something over the years that means more to me then the breeder who puts out 100+ foals and has one or 2 out there showing. Might not be fair but it is just my first and honest opinion.
Anyone else?
Last edited by a moderator: