Miss Vickie,
That would be one among many truths to be examined. But it also takes time and experiance in grade to even begin to understand it. In a crawl, walk run scenario one cannot skip any steps because understanding is built in layers and on the realizations diligent study puts in place and order. Post graduate work must stay in its rightful place , eh?
If I speak to a very simple truth, like the second ammendment and I leave a very visable bread trail to and room for self realization of this simple truth and it is not considered, how much traction will mind control, the use of pschotropic drugs, a debased and degenerate society in general and a host of other truths actually have? Not much if folk are still unable to consume the basics.
Miss Lucky,
The second ammendment has absolutely nothing to do with hunting, target or recreational fire-arms. The purpose is one of the balance of power between the soveregn (you and me) and our created servant.
Rather what I see you speaking to, is the need to hold the individual TRULY accountable for their actions. Punishing little Bobby for what little Billy did made no sense as a kid and most certainly does no more so as adults.
In the end, the ammendment says "shall not be infringed". With over 20,000 gun laws on the books today, two points should be manifestly clear.
1) That is ALOT of infringement already
2) with all them laws in place you still have gun violence
Ignored in all this are the butchers and murderers who poison your food, your air, your water and most certainly your medicine. These genociders are never even talked about. Why is that? because "media" and our fearless "leaders" don't talk about it. WHY? Simple really, they have learned to not bite the hand that feeds them. But, make no mistake about it, this level of murder makes what we were speaking about to look silly in comparison. Is there a problem, well of course, its nailing down the true culprit that is the trick. Suffice to say, it's not the gun or ANY gun. Neither will I surrender a stitch of Liberty, to the falsehood of provided "safety". For in the end it is NEVER safety but rather the surety of despotism. It ALWAYS has been this way. If the bad guys have guns, then you also want the goodguys to posses them. And this opens a scary box. Whom are the real and true bad guys? I learned and lived the answer to this question long ago. Before you create a law robbing millions of a right to self defense, it would be good to answer that question truthfully. I'll give you a hint, you most likely vote for them every election cycle..... For not one of them votes from pure a Constitutional perspective AS THEY ALL SWORE TO DO. Not one.
Am grateful for your time,
Bb