Always interesting to see folk shape and then cherry pick their way through an argument. Often the true reasons and meaning are lost and treated as irrelevant.
As this is about the unborn at it's root re. Hobby Lobby and specific to the morning after pill, a different picture and motivation becomes readily appearent. This is NOT about abortion and that it a very important distinction. Abortion is a naturally occuring event and most often not of our own doing. Rather it is about aborticide and that IS of our own doing and IS murder of the unborn. No amount or level of shapeshifting within the argument changes that fact. As it was God and ONLY God who endowed us with the right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, the murder of the unborn most certainly steals those rights from the unborn by murder.
Now those in favor of such treatment are want to cite roe v wade and are completely unaware of a supremes ruling that occured after that, which stated in para.
"If personhood were ascribed to the unborn, then the question regarding abortion would be over" (Doe vs. Bolton) Congress at the time failed to act and codify this Personhood. And the "church" was nowhere to be found.
As pro-lifers are always playing defense, I have always marveled at their inability to even present the argument in it's unadulterated form. In addition to defending the defenseless, a little offense would go a long way. That being? Why are some folk so rabid in their maintainance of this most heinous murder? At the end of the day, there is NO excuss, no made up argument, no lie, that should EVER trump the God given rights of the unborn. PERIOD. Indeed MOST Christians don't even know why these murders are are performed ultimately. (Lets see who is discerning enough to pursue that angle). When logic is allowed to see the light of day the argument quickly falls apart.
Am I a corp. lover? Um, H, E double toothpicks, NO. As our founders, I too understand the nature of the corp and feel that it should be abolished to the level the founders held them to. That being? VERY tightly controlled and able to ONLY do the project (as in singular) that they were founded to accomplish, and then, when that project was completed, dismantled. However, this isn't about the corporation or Hobby Lobby as some want to shape it. It is about life.
One last correction if I may. The supremes NEVER ruled on the Constitutionality of the misnamed "affordable care act". Rather they ruled on a very narrow portion of that argumnet, the taxes. Again, as there is NO ennumeration within the Constitution granting the fedgov any authority in this realm by the Master or Creator (States), the fedgov is prohibited from acting in this realm.
This is just more fodder being shaped and presented to create polarization and division. This always seems to work so well for them as most want to be led vs. being the Leaders they were created to be.
Now just as 22 years ago when I ws being interveiwed during my run for State house, I will pre-empt the tired counter argument. When pressed by the "reporter" to compromise my stand on the unborn and do so for the sake or "rape or incest" my counter statement still stands. In response I stated, "As we are talking about the 3-4% of aborticides that occure yearly, hows about we treat as criminal, the remaining 96-97% of aborticides commited yearly NOW and then "discuss" the remaining precious ones that are left". As you might imagine, that was the end of the "interview". And THAT shows the motivation for maintaining the vacuous position of murder of the unborn.
"You will be hated and reviled because of me" Said by the same as said "Let the little children come to me" IF there isn't a problem with the taking of these lives and they are so cheapened, then increasing euthanasia becomes increasingly ok as well. And it is doing just that.
Thanks for your time,
Bb