rabbitsfizz
Well-Known Member
Dangerous DOGS not Dangerous BREEDS!!! The stupid Dangerous Dogs Act which over here banned the Pitbull as a breed (but not the Am Staff!! Shows you how much the RSPCA knows about dogs since the Pitbull has never been a breed and the Am Staff is just a Pitbull) completely failed to take into account that fact that the only person actually killed, and thus caused the outcry that led to the act, was, tragically, a little girl, killed by two Rottweiler of which she was in sole control!!!!! The reason the Pitbull was banned over here was because the Police were afraid of them, and they were being used by drug dealers to guard their dealings, so, around and around we go. I am very, very sorry this had to happen but it has nothing to do with the dogs being inherently vicious. They have, merely because of their breeding and nature, more tendency to guard than do a lot of other breeds but no more tendency to attack, and certainly less tendency to attack animals like horses than, say, a border collie. Less tendency to attack a person than, say, a Doberman (which was bred solely to do exactly this) PLEASE learn from our mistakes- lobby for a law forcing people to be responsible for their dogs, not a law that persecutes a breed, and will be unenforceable anyway!! Good Luck....since no-one has yet found a way of making people be even responsible for their own children............