Minimor
Well-Known Member
Thing is, Lisa, if someone isn't going to measure "properly" then it doesn't really matter if the horse is measured at the last mane hair or on top the withers...if the measure stick isn't going to be set on the floor when measuring, even measuring on top the withers isn't going to be accurate.
Sure, by using the last mane hair that is open to interpretation as far as how someone clips the horse or whatever, but if the person measuring is going to ask "which class do you want him in", then it's still entirely possible to measure from a spot 1" down from the top of the withers. Even though I agree it is kind of silly that Miniatures were ever measured from the last mane hair rather than from the top of the withers....in respect to the problem now being discussed I don't think it makes any difference where the measure point is supposed to be.
In the Morgan world, I believe that horses winning a World Championship must have their toe length measured & shoe/pad weighed upon leaving the ring. This means the horse must have a shoe pulled, weighed & then reset after the class. If a shoe is thrown during a class, it is weighed before the farrier resets it. I think someone could also file a protest after a class, & the horse would have to have toe length measured or shoe weighed....perhaps in Minis at National/World level the top placing horses should be measured upon leaving the ring???
I do agree that the trainer in this case had an obligation to show the horse in its class--it was totally wrong to dump the horse because of the protest. It may seem dumb in terms of the business he could lose once word gets around, but there may be those owners who were displeased with the protest & will "reward" that trainer for his "loyalty" to the other trainers, by giving him their business in future. If he's a successful trainer/showman(I have no idea who we're talking about here!
) then there are still going to be owners who want to use him--they will just make very sure they don't rock the boat with him! And he will surely be rewarded by some of the other trainers/judges at future shows--I'm not saying all judges will judge according to who is handling a horse, but yes, there are those that do take that into consideration. Definitely there are those that will blacklist a trainer who does something/supports an owner who does something out of the norm (like filing such a protest)!
Even though nearly all here have stated that they believe the trainer was in the wrong on this issue, you can be sure that there are people out there who believe the owner made a major screw up and that it serves him/her right for placing a protest at all, & especially without the consent of the trainer. Trainer isn't likely to lose all his business over this, I don't think.
Sure, by using the last mane hair that is open to interpretation as far as how someone clips the horse or whatever, but if the person measuring is going to ask "which class do you want him in", then it's still entirely possible to measure from a spot 1" down from the top of the withers. Even though I agree it is kind of silly that Miniatures were ever measured from the last mane hair rather than from the top of the withers....in respect to the problem now being discussed I don't think it makes any difference where the measure point is supposed to be.
In the Morgan world, I believe that horses winning a World Championship must have their toe length measured & shoe/pad weighed upon leaving the ring. This means the horse must have a shoe pulled, weighed & then reset after the class. If a shoe is thrown during a class, it is weighed before the farrier resets it. I think someone could also file a protest after a class, & the horse would have to have toe length measured or shoe weighed....perhaps in Minis at National/World level the top placing horses should be measured upon leaving the ring???
I do agree that the trainer in this case had an obligation to show the horse in its class--it was totally wrong to dump the horse because of the protest. It may seem dumb in terms of the business he could lose once word gets around, but there may be those owners who were displeased with the protest & will "reward" that trainer for his "loyalty" to the other trainers, by giving him their business in future. If he's a successful trainer/showman(I have no idea who we're talking about here!
Even though nearly all here have stated that they believe the trainer was in the wrong on this issue, you can be sure that there are people out there who believe the owner made a major screw up and that it serves him/her right for placing a protest at all, & especially without the consent of the trainer. Trainer isn't likely to lose all his business over this, I don't think.