Roxane Martin
Well-Known Member
All--
This is something I have always wondered about, especially when being gone on vacation and leaving the responsibility to others in my absence. What guidance do I give them? I haven't exactly faced it, but it worries me.
How much money and work am I (or someone I authorize for me) willing to undertake for a very expensive vet situation? And if I decide against following the treatment, does that make me a "bad" pet caretaker? How do you all, if you have had that situation, decide? As much as we'd like, we don't (most of us don't anyway) have unlimited funds and/or time that can be allocated to the ill pet. So how do you decide, and if the decision was made based upon finances, do you have trouble dealing with that decision?
Examples--
1. My old Arab-cross had Cushings. I was able to keep him going for about 3 years on Pergolide, but it was getting up to $200/month for the medicines, including the Banamine/Bute for the chronic founder. Finally, as the founder was getting worse, I had him put down. If I hadn't had a good job that gave me that extra money, the decision may have been different.
2. A barn cat had a very swollen ear that turned out to be from his scratching the ear mites. The inner skin became separated from the outer ear and to fix it, the vet would do a surgery for about $300. I said no, and now the cat has a "califlower" ear--it works, he can hear, it just looks funny.
3. What about a colic that is going to involve thousands of dollars? Would I be an awful person if I said no, put the horse down?
4. Or a broken leg that would take a lot of time to daily manage--would the decision be based upon the likelihood of return to soundness? To be honest, now that I have my own place that I could keep a retiree, I might decide differently than when I paid board for a riding horse--if it wouldn't come back to riding soundness, would I just put the horse down? And if I did, does that make me a "bad" person?
I know a lot of people have very strong ideas about these sorts of things, and the love of the animal isn't being questioned, but there are other considerations. Sometimes when I watch shows like "Animal Cops" I start to feel that if I wouldn't get a kidney transplant for an ailing cat, that I would be considered an abusive owner.
As part of animal ownership comes the responsibility to have the funds to provide care for them, but does that mean having a $10,000 escrow account in case you need an emergency colic surgery?
As this is discussed, remember that everyone is trying to do the best they can by their animals, put everyone's personal limit may be different and their should be no judgement if that limit is not the same as yours.
Thanks.
This is something I have always wondered about, especially when being gone on vacation and leaving the responsibility to others in my absence. What guidance do I give them? I haven't exactly faced it, but it worries me.
How much money and work am I (or someone I authorize for me) willing to undertake for a very expensive vet situation? And if I decide against following the treatment, does that make me a "bad" pet caretaker? How do you all, if you have had that situation, decide? As much as we'd like, we don't (most of us don't anyway) have unlimited funds and/or time that can be allocated to the ill pet. So how do you decide, and if the decision was made based upon finances, do you have trouble dealing with that decision?
Examples--
1. My old Arab-cross had Cushings. I was able to keep him going for about 3 years on Pergolide, but it was getting up to $200/month for the medicines, including the Banamine/Bute for the chronic founder. Finally, as the founder was getting worse, I had him put down. If I hadn't had a good job that gave me that extra money, the decision may have been different.
2. A barn cat had a very swollen ear that turned out to be from his scratching the ear mites. The inner skin became separated from the outer ear and to fix it, the vet would do a surgery for about $300. I said no, and now the cat has a "califlower" ear--it works, he can hear, it just looks funny.
3. What about a colic that is going to involve thousands of dollars? Would I be an awful person if I said no, put the horse down?
4. Or a broken leg that would take a lot of time to daily manage--would the decision be based upon the likelihood of return to soundness? To be honest, now that I have my own place that I could keep a retiree, I might decide differently than when I paid board for a riding horse--if it wouldn't come back to riding soundness, would I just put the horse down? And if I did, does that make me a "bad" person?
I know a lot of people have very strong ideas about these sorts of things, and the love of the animal isn't being questioned, but there are other considerations. Sometimes when I watch shows like "Animal Cops" I start to feel that if I wouldn't get a kidney transplant for an ailing cat, that I would be considered an abusive owner.
As part of animal ownership comes the responsibility to have the funds to provide care for them, but does that mean having a $10,000 escrow account in case you need an emergency colic surgery?
As this is discussed, remember that everyone is trying to do the best they can by their animals, put everyone's personal limit may be different and their should be no judgement if that limit is not the same as yours.
Thanks.