Let me state that I am not affiliated with IAMHA but I do believe they have some good ideas and I think they deserve equal time here. Below is a response from Mark Wilson to AMHA's Message.
Mark wondered if anyone had the nerve to post this so here ya go! He probably knew I would be dumb enough.
Ronnie
__________________________________________________________________
Mike,
You stated in your President's response to the IAMHA launch that 6 months
ago two of the IAMHA directors served as Pres and VP and AMHA. You implied
without directly saying, we were serving two masters, nothing could be
further from the truth. We were not involved with the IAMHA until after
resigning from the Executive Committee. You also wanted to know why as BOD
members, suggestions and ideas were not offered to the BOD and the AMHA.
Suzy and I both served on the Computer Committee, and I made it clear to you
personally, at the June BOD meeting, that We had not resigned from that
committee and with 18 years experience in the Information Systems field had
much expertise to bring to the table. I also told Sheryl P the same thing.
You indicated that we were welcome to continue to serve on the Computer
Committee. From that point forward I did not receive a single call or email
from the new Co-Chairs. The next thing you know, at the World Show a formal
presentation is made by Mark H. The obvious point here is input and
suggestions are not wanted and control is maintained by a select group. Is
that how a committee that is challenged with one of the most critical issues
the AMHA faced is supposed to operate.. Not one single email or phone call,
just a recommendation and a vote. Now because of the decision made by the
BOD, of which I did not support, 2007 is looking at solving a budget deficit
in the $75,000 area. Is there any wonder when I was approached by the IAMHA
and given a feel for their focus, that I wouldn't jump at the chance to be
part of a progressive group, interested in the promotion and proliferation
of The American Miniature Horse!
I would appreciate more truth regarding actual facts when you address the
masses in the future. I have given my time, dollars and expertise to the
AMHA and will continue to do so, but someone is going to have to wake up and
smell the coffee while there is still time.
This response is being sent to the BOD, I wonder if anyone will have the
nerve to post it on LB.
Regards,
Mark
Mark wondered if anyone had the nerve to post this so here ya go! He probably knew I would be dumb enough.
Ronnie
__________________________________________________________________
Mike,
You stated in your President's response to the IAMHA launch that 6 months
ago two of the IAMHA directors served as Pres and VP and AMHA. You implied
without directly saying, we were serving two masters, nothing could be
further from the truth. We were not involved with the IAMHA until after
resigning from the Executive Committee. You also wanted to know why as BOD
members, suggestions and ideas were not offered to the BOD and the AMHA.
Suzy and I both served on the Computer Committee, and I made it clear to you
personally, at the June BOD meeting, that We had not resigned from that
committee and with 18 years experience in the Information Systems field had
much expertise to bring to the table. I also told Sheryl P the same thing.
You indicated that we were welcome to continue to serve on the Computer
Committee. From that point forward I did not receive a single call or email
from the new Co-Chairs. The next thing you know, at the World Show a formal
presentation is made by Mark H. The obvious point here is input and
suggestions are not wanted and control is maintained by a select group. Is
that how a committee that is challenged with one of the most critical issues
the AMHA faced is supposed to operate.. Not one single email or phone call,
just a recommendation and a vote. Now because of the decision made by the
BOD, of which I did not support, 2007 is looking at solving a budget deficit
in the $75,000 area. Is there any wonder when I was approached by the IAMHA
and given a feel for their focus, that I wouldn't jump at the chance to be
part of a progressive group, interested in the promotion and proliferation
of The American Miniature Horse!
I would appreciate more truth regarding actual facts when you address the
masses in the future. I have given my time, dollars and expertise to the
AMHA and will continue to do so, but someone is going to have to wake up and
smell the coffee while there is still time.
This response is being sent to the BOD, I wonder if anyone will have the
nerve to post it on LB.
Regards,
Mark