Millstone Farm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2002
- Messages
- 591
- Reaction score
- 0
I find it somewhat amusing, ironic and disturbing to read different people's take on the definition of an amateur. In simplest terms, an amateur is someone who does not accept payment for a laundry list of equine services.
So why is it that every single year we have the same negative posts about certain successful amateurs? This year it was Erica as the AMHR Nationals "professional amateur" and, although not named, an another individual who shows in AMHA shows (his identity was thinly veiled in a throwaway reference - but he not named).
I have never met Erica but applaude her for her accomplishments. I think she is a shining example of a true amateur. I find it appalling that her name has been sullied because of her success. She is the first to share advise and tips on this Forum.
The other person, who was described as having the wealth to buy the best and hire the best had his amateur status questioned too. TO quote a friend, since when does one's income level affect one's amateur status? THis person, if i am right in who was alluded to, is also very generous and has sponsored the jackets given to the World Champions. Might i suggest if you have a problem you not accept a jacket should you win a class at Worlds?
An amateur is an amateur and it doesn't matter how long or how well they show. If they aren't paid for their services, they have every right to show in that division.
I think the bigger issue are the individuals who hide the fact that they accept payment on the sly to show other people's horses (or to train them, etc.) and then attempt to pass themselves off as Level 1 amateurs.
So why is it that every single year we have the same negative posts about certain successful amateurs? This year it was Erica as the AMHR Nationals "professional amateur" and, although not named, an another individual who shows in AMHA shows (his identity was thinly veiled in a throwaway reference - but he not named).
I have never met Erica but applaude her for her accomplishments. I think she is a shining example of a true amateur. I find it appalling that her name has been sullied because of her success. She is the first to share advise and tips on this Forum.
The other person, who was described as having the wealth to buy the best and hire the best had his amateur status questioned too. TO quote a friend, since when does one's income level affect one's amateur status? THis person, if i am right in who was alluded to, is also very generous and has sponsored the jackets given to the World Champions. Might i suggest if you have a problem you not accept a jacket should you win a class at Worlds?
An amateur is an amateur and it doesn't matter how long or how well they show. If they aren't paid for their services, they have every right to show in that division.
I think the bigger issue are the individuals who hide the fact that they accept payment on the sly to show other people's horses (or to train them, etc.) and then attempt to pass themselves off as Level 1 amateurs.