FYI - House to vote next week - Section 738 would cut off funding for

Miniature Horse Talk Forums

Help Support Miniature Horse Talk Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Cathy_H

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
2,113
Reaction score
0
This was sent to me so I'm passing it along - I don't have time to check it out right now. Any thoughts/comments?

The House of Representative is scheduled to vote on the 2008

Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration

Appropriations bill (H.R. 3161), which would fund the U.S. Department of

Agriculture for Fiscal Year 2008, early next week.

Section 738 of that bill would be devastating because it would cut-off

funding for USDA activities important to the horse industry. It would

eliminate funding necessary for USDA to operate quarantine facilities

and to pay personnel to approve and facilitate the import and export of

horses for exhibition, competition, sale or breeding. The bill would

not only cut off direct funding to USDA, but also eliminate USDA's

authority to impose user fees, which support the operation of the three

major USDA Animal Import Centers and the land border ports along the

Canadian and Mexican bordersWe are asking AHC member organizations to contact Members of Congress

from their state asking that this provision be removed.

NOTE: Although the language is an apparent attempt by proponents of

legislation to end the slaughter of horses for human consumption by

taking the USDA out of the process, as was done last year, the language

in Section 738 would have a far broader impact and would affect the

movement of all horses.

While an individual's or organization's position on limiting USDA's

authority to inspect horses for slaughter may be based on their position

on the federal bill banning slaughter, the industry should be opposed to

this overly-broad limit on USDA's authority and economic ability to

protect animal health through inspection, quarantine and oversight of

the movement of all horses.

The AHC is opposed to this language for animal health reasons and

because it would have an extremely adverse effect on important equine

activities and commerce. The AHC supports the effort to have it removed

when the House considers the USDA Appropriations bill.

We are asking AHC members and individuals to do the same. Contacts are

needed to all Members of the House. When contacting your

Representative, please fax or e-mail your letter to him or her.

Below is a draft letter that you can personalize.

Please fax or e-mail us copies of any letters you send to Congress.

The AHC fax number is 202-296-1970. E-mails can be sent to

[email protected].

Please call the AHC (202) 296-4031 if you have any questions.

Date

The Honorable ...

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative...:

I am writing to you because of Section 738 in the 2008 Agriculture,

Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration Appropriations bill

(H.R. 3161). That section would be devastating to the horse industry.

It should be removed when you consider the bill.

I live in .... and am involved in the horse industry ... [Describe your

involvement, for example, owner, breeder, racing, showing, veterinarian,

farrier, race track, etc. If you have economic information about the

size of the industry in your state, include it. You can look at the AHC

website - www.horsecouncil.org - for some states. If you are writing

for an organization, indicate how many members you have and what your

activities involve. If you have any events, shows, races, sales,

breeding or activities that could involve horses from other countries or

your horses leaving the U.S., please note them since they would be

affected by this provision.]

Section 738 of that bill would be devastating because it would cut-off

funding for USDA activities important to the horse industry. It would

eliminate funding necessary for USDA to operate quarantine facilities

and to pay personnel to approve and facilitate the import and export of

horses for exhibition, competition, sale or breeding. The bill would

not only cut off direct funding to USDA, but also eliminate USDA's

authority to impose user fees which support the operation of the three

major USDA Animal Import Centers and the land border ports along the

Canadian and Mexican borders.

The welfare of all horses and the horse industry is based to a large

degree on the many safety nets that the U.S. Department of Agriculture

has set up to protect the health and well-being of our domestic horse

population. This provision would dramatically impact the authority and

ability of the USDA to maintain those protections because it would deny

funds for the various inspections required under current federal law for

all horses. It would also have an extremely adverse effect on important

equine activities and commerce.

Please support any effort to have this onerous section deleted from the

USDA Appropriations bill.

Sincerely,

Kentucky Horse Council

4063 Iron Works Parkway

Building B, Suite 2

Lexington, KY 40511

[email protected]

www.kentuckyhorse.org
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If they can't control us one way...via NAIS...they are going to do it other ways. Just wish they would stop their silly games.

But I know of two Import/export farms..that have nothing to do with the USDA.. are licened and offer a good aterative. One is now in upper State NY..and is a private farm.
 
I am going to do more research on this to really know what is going on. The funding that has been given has not always been to the benefit of the horses but in many cases only to the breeders and slaughter places. I don't want someone else paying for my responsibilites and I don't want to pay for what is someone elses responibilites. Government has it's nose in far too many things and it can cost everyone immensely except for those who are making big bucks from the industry. I am not impressed with the government inspections that tax payers have been paying for. I am not saying at this time if I am for or against the proposed changes but I do know I want to learn more and hope everyone else does before making any decisions. Mary
 
Cathy, I am or rather was a member of the Ky. Horse Council, and I did not receive that notification. Of course since I no longer live there, that could be the reason.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top