Zhu Zhu pets...

Miniature Horse Talk Forums

Help Support Miniature Horse Talk Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Sanny

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
788
Reaction score
0
Location
Orono, MN
Unless your child has allergies, just buy them a real hamster already instead of a toy one. Cheaper, safer, more fun and teaches them responsibility with the care and feeding requirements.

How does this even happen in this day and age.

NEWS STORY

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah (ABC 4 NEWS) - This years must have toy the Zhu Zhu pet has been deemed dangerous by a consumer watchdog group claiming the toy has high levels of toxic metals.

But the maker of the robotic Zhu Zhu Pets hamsters defended its product against a study by San Francisco-based GoodGuide that said higher-than-allowed levels of the chemical antimony were found in the toy.

Good Guide named Zhu Zhu Pets hamsters one of the top-selling toys with low ratings after finding antimony, which can cause health problems, on the hair and nose of one of the toy hamsters, called Mr. Squiggles.

The group assigned the toy, aimed at 3- to 10-year-olds, a rating of 5.2 on a 10-point scale.

But the toy's maker, St. Louis-based Cepia LLC, insisted in a statement that its product is safe and has passed rigorous testing. The company said it was contacting GoodGuide to share its testing data and determine how the report was founded.

"I have been in the toy industry for more than 35 years, and being a father of children myself, I would never allow any substandard or unsafe product to hit the shelves," Russ Hornsby, Cepia's CEO, said in the statement.

Zhu Zhu Pets, which retail for about $10, have become this season's toy craze, following in the footsteps of Tickle Me Elmo and Cabbage Patch Kids. The items fetch $40 or more on resale Web sites like eBay and Craigslist.

That's what brought it to GoodGuide's attention. GoodGuide CEO Dara O'Rourke told APhttp://www.abc4.com/content/news/state/sto....cspx?rss=1451# on Saturday that his group bought three of each of the year's 30 hottest toys and tested them multiple times.

Antimony was measured at 93 parts per million in the hamster's fur and at 106 parts per million in its nose. Both readings exceed the allowable level of 60 parts per million, said O'Rourke, an associate professor of environmental science at the University of California Berkeley.http://www.abc4.com/content/news/state/sto....cspx?rss=1451#

Rourke said GoodGuide's test results, released Friday, also indicated the possibility that some toys contained phthalates, chemicals that were subject to tougher standards in the Consumer Protection Safety Improvement Act passed last year.

If you have toys or other items that you want to check for safety you can visit the U.S Product Safety Commissions website.

Copyright 2009 Newport Television LLC All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
 
And these were on top of Faiths list..
default_unsure.png
 
If you can find them. I work P/T at a drugstore chain, they have put a limit on how many you can buy. I would just buy a real hamster my self.
 
Caught this on some news show don't remember the particulars but in short the toy is safe. Something about the technology used to determine the harmful levels often gives false positives and the toy advocacy group jumped the gun before further testing. I did a quick goggle search and msnbc, fox and other credible sources list the toy as being safe.

I scratch my head as to why it's a "must have" but I did clean up after a gerbil that was "loaned" to us for two years and I can think of several little reasons as to why a mechanical one would be better than the real deal.
default_laugh.png
 
Yes, it is safe. The company that originally announced it was not safe has now issued a statement retracting and explaining they didn't use the same / appropriate testing proceedures.
 
Caught this on some news show don't remember the particulars but in short the toy is safe. Something about the technology used to determine the harmful levels often gives false positives and the toy advocacy group jumped the gun before further testing. I did a quick goggle search and msnbc, fox and other credible sources list the toy as being safe.
I scratch my head as to why it's a "must have" but I did clean up after a gerbil that was "loaned" to us for two years and I can think of several little reasons as to why a mechanical one would be better than the real deal.
default_laugh.png
I saw it on the Today show yesterday. I'm glad nobody I have to shop for is asking for one.

Marlee, I love your profile pic
default_new_rofl.gif
default_new_rofl.gif
 
This story was found to be not true. Also, if you have a five year old that wants a hampster these might be a good way to go. My Nephew, when he was 5 had a hampster. Children do not always have the best reasoning. He felt his dresser drawer was a safe place for his hampster while he ate lunch. When he went to retrive his hampster the drawer would not pull out so he jerked on it. What he saw no child should see. the hampsters head, well, you can figure it out. He would have done much better with a toy hampster. He is now 9 and wants nothing to do with a hampster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Marlee, I love your profile pic
default_new_rofl.gif
default_new_rofl.gif

Ahh yes my little cyber slap buddies...gotta love'em don't you.
default_biggrin.png
Had them forwarded to me over a year ago and I still chuckle to myself when I see them.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top