I was not meaning to imply that he answered before he got the letter, but, you did get correspondence from AMHA. As for Mike not sending it directly, he is BRAND new to the internet and email.
Also, just because it was forwarded to the board does not mean they got it, as I just found out that some of the newer members emails from the board are bouncing. I am trying to get it resolved.
As for a response to this letter that went out, I cannot answer to that, don't know the contents, but I suggest that you call Mike at the phone number he sent to you twice, and have a conversation rather than an email or postal mail conversation.
boy, am I ever sorry I entered this 'conversation', I resolve to just shut up.
Jody, I wish you would not feel sorry that you have given input to a conversation here. It is always welcomed. We may not always agree, but it is always welcome!
I am confused though by a few things in this post of yours. Your first line about getting correspondence from AMHA...yes, as I said, I did receive that email dated March 27, but again, that was before we sent the letter of March 28. When I posted this original message here it was in regards to the letter sent to Mike Want's home by UPS on March 28, signed for as received (by a female in the house) on March 31, and emailed to AMHA and the BOD in the evening of March 31. This is the letter that we asked a response to, so whatever was sent before this, really has no bearing on the matter.
Also, you said, "
As for a response to this letter that went out, I cannot answer to that, don't know the contents ". This letter that you refer to here, you do know the contents of. It was the same one that was sent to Mike Want's home(hard copy) and the same one that I emailed, complete with attachments) to each and every BOD member. THIS is the letter that was sent that asked for the courtesy reply, and that we are referring to when I posted this message here. So since I sent it to every BOD member and it was forwarded to all BOD members by Mike Want, then I think that each BOD member should have received one copy or the other.
As for him Mike Want being brand new to computers/email, I see a bit of a double standard here. As members we are all expected to have access to the internet and the ability to use it to keep ourselves informed of what is going on in our organization, as that is how AMHA communicates with us, yet we are supposed to accept a president that is new to the internet and doesn't know how to use it? He was elected president in June 2006, so why has he not tried to learn something about using the interned in the last two years?
Also, to comment on another post here, no, it is definately NOT my intent to paint all with the same brush. We appreciate those that did respond, even if it was not in detail or not in agreement with our attempts, but just enough to say they received it, but when we constantly hear that our directors work for us, then something like this happens, I feel it is important to share the results of it with members from all areas, as maybe their directors are not working as hard for the members of that area as those members think they are, or are lead to believe they are.