Nature Versus Nurture: Factors that Affect Growth of Horses

Miniature Horse Talk Forums

Help Support Miniature Horse Talk Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jill

Aspiring Cowgirl
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
27,188
Reaction score
528
Location
Spotsy., VA (USA)
I just read this article this morning and thought I would pass it along. It may be of interest to other LB members, too. I keep up with KER's articles and they formulate the feeds we use here for our horses
default_yes.gif


-----------------------

Nature Versus Nurture: Factors that Affect Growth of Horses

By Kentucky Equine Research Staff · February 25, 2011

Large, well-grown horses are the desired mounts in many equine disciplines. Because birth weight influences mature body weight in some breeds, breeders aim to produce heavy foals at birth. A foal's birth weight is about 10% of mature body weight, but this can vary from about 7% of mature weight in draft breeds and up to 14% of mature weight in small ponies such as Shetlands. What is remarkable is that at birth, foals have only achieved 17% of mature bone mineral content and don't reach mature bone mineral content until six years of age.

Several management practices are used by breeders to increase the chances of a heavy foal. These include supplementary feeding of mares during pregnancy and selecting for large mares. Because birth weight of the foal is on average 10% of mare body weight, larger mares tend to deliver larger foals.

Mare age and number of foals she has had in the past have also been shown to affect foal size. Mares between the ages of 7 and 11 have foals of heavier birth weight and foals born to maiden mares have lower birth weights than those who have had foals in the past. Foals with higher birth weights are generally heavier throughout life, and there is some evidence that Thoroughbreds with low birth weight (<88 pounds, 40 kilograms) were less likely to race and have inferior racing performance characteristics compared to heavier foals.

Rapid growth occurs during the first year of life. At six months of age foals are about 40% of mature weight and 80% of mature height, and by 12 months of age foals have reached about 60% of mature weight and 90% of mature height. By 24 months of age horses have reached 96% of mature weight and nearly reached mature height.

Horses generally show a similar pattern of growth between birth and 18 months of age. The most rapid growth occurs in the first month of life with daily weight gain declining over the next 11 months of age. In temperate climates, the observed lowest point in growth rate around 10-11 months of age coincides with the winter months of decreased pasture quality and availability. Around 12-14 months of age, weight gain increases in conjunction with a usual spring pasture flush, onset of puberty and sometimes preparation for early season sales. Breed has an influence on growth patterns with ponies maturing faster than larger horses. Smaller breeds reach a greater proportion of their mature weight or height at a younger age than do larger breeds that keep growing for a longer time period.

Birth month and birth season have a significant effect on growth rate as foals born in the winter are generally smaller than those born later in the season. A study of 3,909 Thoroughbred mares and their foals in Kentucky has shown that winter-born foals (those born in January and February) were smaller at birth and grew slower during the first two months compared with spring-born foals.

These winter-born foals then exhibited rapid daily weight gain at three months of age, coinciding with a spring pasture flush. This compensatory growth resulted in there being no difference in body weights between foals born in any birth month at five months of age. Later-born foals (those born in May and June) exhibited the lowest daily weight gains at two, three, and four months, which coincides with late summer pasture losing its quality, suggesting a definite seasonal effect on foal weight gain.

Interestingly, mare body weight and condition had a strong effect on foal growth as foal body weight was positively correlated to mare body weight, foal ADG (average daily gain) was positively associated with mare ADG, and foal fatness (indicated by body condition score or BCS) was positively related to mare BCS during the first five months of life. These relationships indicate that heavier mares produce heavier foals, faster growing foals are from mares that are gaining weight, and fatter foals (those with higher BCS) are produced from fatter mares. In addition, there was a positive relationship between foal BCS and mare daily weight change at two and three months (peak lactation), indicating mares that are gaining weight during the first three months of lactation have fatter foals.

Regardless of birth month, mares that exhibited a negative energy balance postpartum (losing weight or negative daily weight change) had foals that did not gain as much weight as mares that were in a positive energy balance at any time between birth and five months postpartum. January- and February-foaling mares tended to lose weight in early lactation, suggesting that their caloric intake is insufficient to meet their energy requirements for early lactation. Later in lactation when the climate was warmer and there was access to adequate pasture, these early-foaling mares gained more weight and supported faster growth rates in their foals than later-foaling mares.

Link to KER's article: http://www.equinews....rowth-of-horses
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting article. Sounds like their results are all based on the mare being on good pasture - which may be the case in Kentucky lol, not always here. I wonder how mares compare who never have access to good grazing pasture but are fed high quality feed/hay all through pregnancy.

Their findings might change the push in race & show horses for January foals, as it sounds like they don't really have any advantage.

Jan
 
Jan, I thought the same thing regarding pasture and my minis because mine are on dry lots. I'm guessing the nutrition of high quality feeds and hay translates, but that's just my guess.... Plus, I wonder too how many minis can actually be out on a very lush pasture anyway in the spring w/o the risk of founder?

I wish they would have gone into the difference a diet high in fats and / or proteins effects the rate of growth in foals because I've felt like they "get there sooner" as foals when they're on a high protein diet, but that's just what I think. I can't prove it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jan, I still think the early foal has an advantage, due to just having more time to mature. They are comparing foals at 5 months of age, no matter the birth month, so a foal that is 5 months old in May is still going to have an advantage over the foal that is 5 months old in August at the show in September. I think we can all agree that a horse that has just turned two years is still significantly less physically mature than they will be at age 2-1/2, and much less than they will be at age 3.

This is the statement that really caused my eyebrows to raise:

What is remarkable is that at birth, foals have only achieved 17% of mature bone mineral content and don't reach mature bone mineral content until six years of age.
That really, REALLY should have an impact on how and when we "load" a horse with significant exercise, and even more so weight-bearing (talking about big horses). It also should "guide" us in our harnessing decisions for young horses. I wish there was funding available to study the long-term effects of tightly strapped wrap straps and checking up severely on a young horse. The amount of time a horse is subject to this uncomfortable arrangement isn't long each day, so it may not be a huge deal. But maybe it is? Hard to say. Interesting, though! I have a mare that was pushed pretty hard as a 3yo through a Nationals campaign, and was driven as a Single Pleasure horse through much of it, and she is fine and tough as nails now as a 7yo. It would be nice if there was real data gathered and applied though, as opposed to our observation. Probably many people have read Dr. Deb Bennett's "Ranger study," but here is a link to it if you haven't: Equine Studies article. It has been updated since I last read it, so I am going to read it again, myself. This is really important stuff to know, especially if you do anything more with your horse than halter. Even halter horses are subject to, in many cases, heavy conditioning. This information could guide someone to make informed decisions about how to go about that, as well.
 
ClickMini, that was an absolutely amazing article. It did a better job of explaining skeletal maturity than any I've read yet. I wish there had been some contact info so I could request permission to reprint it in our club newsletter. It might be a bit longer than some people would want to read but it is information I think every one should have. Thank you for posting the link.
default_smile.png
 
Sorry Jill, yes I read the article you posted as well and found it fascinating reading but I was referring to the "Ranger Study" one by Dr. Bennett that Amy posted the link for. I found the growth rate, birth size article you posted of great interest
default_aktion033.gif
but the one on skeletal maturity could help some of our less experienced owners/trainers understand what they can expect at various ages and why waiting before driving/jumping work is so important. So that is why I would love to reprint it in our local newsletter.
default_yes.gif
 
Both articles are extremely interesting and provide great food for thought - thank you for posting them.
default_aktion033.gif


Anna
 
Back
Top