election next time around

Miniature Horse Talk Forums

Help Support Miniature Horse Talk Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
As a democrat I'm hoping that several others run, we need a choice. One of the reasons I 'm not a fan is because of the cell phone problem. I'm sure that most of you have had family deaths and weddings to plan and I'm sure that you couldn't use your work time to make plans. Normal people have to do their planning on personal time, not work time. As a Gov. worker, we were paying her salary while she was on the phone rather doing what we were paying her for. Shame on her for thinking she is THAT special.
 
I do think the Republicans have quite a few good choices already....Bush definately not one of them! I'm hoping he doesn't bother.

I don't want another Bush....or Clinton.
 
I will NOT be voting for Hillary.I don't trust her and think she will do anything to get what she wants-ethical or not.I think she is not trustworthy based on past behavior.I think she went along with slick Willie's antics because,even back then she had big plans for running for President. I am hoping we get some good choices, but not optimistic about good people running.Very discouraged with our political system and the Blame Game.These candidates bad mouth each other and have nothing nice to say about opponents during the campaigns and then are best buds and suck ups with each other when it is over so they can become VP or get a cabinet seat as a consolation prize.
 
Minimor, as far as your two questions...nope for me on both.
default_wink.png


As far as a choice of another Bush or another Clinton, that would be like trying to decide if I would prefer to have an enema or a root canal. Sonya is right on.
 
The Republicans will, as usual, have too many candidates. We will once again fall into the trap of allowing the liberals to pick the "conservative" candidate. Knowing I will sound like a pessimist I predict whoever has the most money will get the nomination, run a close race with Hil and in spite of all her past, present, and future scandals will lose to Clinton. RINOS/puppets will destroy any hope that a true patriot with common sense and world smarts and blessed with discernment that wants to stick to the Constitution and make all decisions based on love of country and morality rather than love of self could hope to have. Hope I am absolutely wrong. Just in case I am right, I intend to not run low on KY jelly.

Sincerely,

Prophet of Gloom and Doom
 
puppets will destroy any hope that a true patriot with common sense and world smarts and blessed with discernment that wants to stick to the Constitution and make all decisions based on love of country and morality rather than love of self could hope to have. Hope I am absolutely wrong......

Well Miss Vickie, as we had 2 chances to elect such a rarity and his OWN party lied about and buried him along with an ever so compliant and payed for media, please place your hope back in your pocket for safe keeping.

NOT one of them meets the above requirements. Kennedy was the last and he was accidental.

As an aside, seeing as how the congress no longer seems to be creating law or even stopping the law breakers, couldn't we just go to an open dictatorship and save a PILE of money on salaries? Seems like we could rent the two houses out for special events and such........

The gyrocopter feller tells everybody in the freaking world what he is going to do, including the white house, and it still "catches them by surprise" (man have i got the bridge for you, will that be check or credit card) and all the thieves can talk about is "how did this happen?" Never once do they talk about why he did this and did it, AND did it peacefully. Rather they insist that he go through his congress critter. Really? Please see above paragraph........

Just passin through,

Bb
 
Nice to see you passing through Bb. I will give you a head nod and a gooday and keep on a walkin myself. Time is really too valuable to waste in our circumstances. Hope is a sitting in my pocket with a few nickels and some lint.
 
Kennedy? You liked KENNEDY??? Pfft. <goes away shaking my head>

If we are to have hope....I have to hope that we do not get another Kennedy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I take it you didn't know Kennedy beyond the "scandals". Pity really, he was the last one that tried in earnest to take on that "insidious evil" he talked about just 10 days before that evil had him murdered on national T.V. We are where we are today because he failed in that very noble cause. The 4 policies he was pursuing to eliminate that monster all point to one entity with numerous foot soldiers.

But I'm sure you know him better than I do.
 
Oh I am so sorry I did not realize that you and he were besties. He and I were not coffee buddies by any means so you surely knew him better than I did. I do not like to speak negatively of anyone's personal friends. Do forgive me.
 
Carriage, I was only in the 2nd or 3rd grade when Kennedy was killed. I remember when I was washing my hands in the restroom when a girl a year older than me came in and announced that the President had been shot and that she was glad because she hated him. She must have known a lot more about politics than me at the time because what she said just left me perplexed. Fast forward several years later and I don't know what she sees in retrospect but I think maybe I see that he was against the Federal Reserve or something involving the nation's finances. Am I even in the ballpark? You were into history way before I ever considered it.
 
I did not mean to ignore Hilary, as this thread began with inquiries about her. Heard "Josh" struggling with inquiries about her money raising and previous job today. Likely it is all on the up and up and besides, what difference does it make?
default_wink.png
:wink
default_wink.png
 
Was happy to leave it at the "snort" but am also grateful for a chance to show what Kennedy was doing.

If we could slip into our studies mode for a second it will again prove assertions regarding the "attack" as demonstrated here recently. Always look for the attack in all of its myriad forms as it is the tell you need to ascertain the nature of the conversation and it's honesty. In the above case nothing of any substance was brought to the table to counter my assertions. Rather an attempt to discredit me, not through facts, but just plain striking out was pursued. The attack will many times have to have the last word even if the word is meaningless.

But Yes Miss Vickie, he was going against the fed by taking its money making power away and placing it properly within Constitutional bounds, back with the treasury. However he knew that it went far deeper than just our "satellite" fed. He knew that our fed was controlled by the City in London who controls all such "feds" around the world. From a financial perspective, England never did give up its hold on America's finances.

This become vividly clear following the war of 1812.

Next, he realized that America had been set up for Vietnam after world war two and was in the process of pulling us back from that "police action"

Further having been thoroughly screwed by CIA activity, he was wanting to severely curtail it's activities and bring all of what they did under close scrutiny. It must be remembered that all such clandestine services work for that international banker at the top FIRST and then for the host country secondarily.

He refused Israel the atomic bomb.

While he may have been working on other reforms, these were the four that got him murdered by "that dreadful House" as Jackie was quoted.

That the despicable Johnson had all of these reversed only six months later is further proof as to who gave the order to pull the trigger and it does all of it point to "the city" in London.

The warnings about the "insidious evil that has seized control of our country" go clear back to the events of 1812. MANY notable congress critters and other notables have clearly warned of the evil and its origin and location.

Thanks for your time.
 
Sorry. no, I was not trying to discredit you. My snort was simply expressing my contempt for anyone who liked JFK.

Scandal is one thing--frankly I don't care who a president might have under his desk nor what she might be doing there, if he is a good president. That is his wofe''s problem. But when the whole family is about as crooked as a dog's hind leg, then IMO no matter how wonderful the policies that person does not belong in the presidents office.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top